In an unnecessary referendum, the weak majority elected an option that they could not understand, because they had not done it before and did not know the consequences. In this way, the new prime minister, without knowing the complexities, adopted the outcome and started the withdrawal in March 2017. ” About 70 days later, the same party lost its majority in the Majles elections and succeeded only with a weak victory.
The conservative government is planning to end the union in late March 2019. In the meantime, European companies active in some way, and some other union, and the British, are themselves in a different order. Because the complex and upright interactions can not be stopped suddenly and all the things turn out to turn out to leave the union. At the moment, more attention is paid to business and economic affairs.
Along with this, the country is in a state of emergency and has been involved in various crises. So the important question is that a “national government” must be formed?
Teresa has invited all parties to present their ideas on how to manage the country and solve the crisis. “It’s possible that we do not agree on everything,” he says, “but these ideas can make things better. A comment that was mocked by others, but why?
In spite of the fact that some of his speeches are a secret trap for opposition parties, because they are actually asked to hold the minority government without having to receive it in the meanwhile; that is, Teresa is witty and without regard to critical situations The country wants to keep all the power for the party, while the outcome of the election as well as the crisis situation demands something else.
In this period of crisis, the national government can make problems worse. The national government is a coalition of major political parties, in which each of those parties has a share in it. Hence, national governments can form a response to a crisis. For example, during the Second World War, Clement Atleley, leader of the Labor Party, was Vice Prime Minister Winston Churchill. World War I was also governed by a national government. More importantly, in 1931, the national government was formed in response to the start of the Great Depression. The fall of Wall Street in October 1929 marked the beginning of the crisis. At that time, Ramsey McDonald, like the current situation in Teresa in the UK, lacked the majority. So that unemployment was sharply increasing and exports fell sharply between 1929 and 1931. Part of the reason for that crisis was also the value of Irling’s high value over gold or the so-called “gold standard.” The government was struggling to balance the budget (Keynes’s main belief in the vote) in any way, which, of course, led to an increase in unemployment.
Today, similar with the same period, we face a set of challenges, and there are good reasons for the formation of a national government. As early as 1931, the economic deterioration is on the rise, and the government has made efforts to raise taxes and reduce public spending. A report indicates that it will be very difficult for the government to balance the budget, and foreign investors are beginning to withdraw their funds from London.
Therefore, the national government must be formed and this coalition should consist of a range of liberal-conservative parties, and it will not succeed.
